The Task Between Us: When Counselling Exercises Begin to Feel Like Exams
Photo: Sembazuru, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons
There is a moment, familiar to many people in counselling, when a gentle suggestion from a therapist turns into something heavier. A journal is recommended, a breathing exercise is shared, a worksheet is printed. The intention is usually kind: to offer something steady between sessions, a small anchor when the week feels unsettled. But somewhere between the consulting room and the kitchen table, the invitation can change character. It becomes a task. And a task, in the mind of someone already used to measuring themselves, can quickly become an exam.
In Blackburn and across the UK, people often arrive at counselling carrying a familiar vocabulary of productivity. They speak of needing to do better, keep up, stay on top of things. It is not surprising that this language follows them into therapy. What is more surprising, perhaps, is how easily a therapeutic exercise can be absorbed into the same frame. The journal becomes evidence. The breathing app becomes a record of consistency. The worksheet becomes a test of commitment. When that happens, the very tool meant to ease pressure can begin to apply it.
When a Tool Becomes a Yardstick
Between-session tasks are not new. Many approaches to counselling offer something to try outside the room, whether it is noticing a thought pattern, practising a grounding technique, or writing a few lines at the end of the day. Used well, these tasks can support awareness and give shape to the week. They can help someone feel that the work continues, gently, beyond the fifty minutes.
Yet there is a difference between a task offered as an experiment and a task received as an expectation. The first invites curiosity: try this and see what happens. The second invites judgement: do this and report back on whether you succeeded. For clients who have long experience of being assessed, praised for compliance or criticised for falling short, the second reading can arrive almost automatically. The exercise is no longer something to explore. It is something to pass.
This is not a failure of the client, nor necessarily a mistake by the therapist. It is a collision between a well-meant tool and a deeply learned habit of self-scrutiny. The task meets the inner critic, and the inner critic takes charge.
The Quiet Signs of a Homework Trap
The shift is often subtle. It may show up as a flicker of dread before opening a notebook, or a vague sense of relief when a session is cancelled. Someone might describe having done the exercise, but in a flat tone that suggests duty rather than discovery. They may apologise before the therapist has asked anything. They may say, with a small laugh, that they are behind on their homework.
The language itself is telling. Homework belongs to school, where performance is measured and marks are given. Therapy is not a lesson, and the person sitting in the chair is not a pupil. When the vocabulary of the classroom creeps into counselling, it can be worth pausing. What is being measured here? And who is doing the measuring?
Other signs are quieter still. A client may begin to curate what they bring to the session, offering only the entries that sound insightful and hiding the blank pages. They may compare their progress to an imagined standard, or to a friend who seems to be doing therapy more efficiently. They may treat a missed breathing practice as proof of something larger: that they are not trying hard enough, that they are wasting the therapist’s time, that they are, once again, falling short.
Why Shame Grows in the Gap
Shame thrives in the gap between how we think we should be and how we actually are. A between-session task can widen that gap. The ideal is a person who journals every evening, breathes mindfully on the bus, and completes each worksheet with honest reflection. The reality is often a person who is tired, busy, distracted, or simply not in the mood. If the task is treated as a measure, that ordinary reality becomes a verdict.
It is worth saying plainly: not doing a task is not a moral failing. It is information. It may mean the task was poorly suited, the timing was wrong, or the person needed rest rather than reflection. It may mean that the exercise touched something uncomfortable and was quietly set aside. None of this needs to be confessed as a shortcoming. It can be explored as a useful part of the work.
The difficulty is that shame often discourages exactly the conversation that would help. A client who feels they have failed at the homework may be reluctant to mention it, which leaves the therapist unaware and the task still in place. The silence grows, and with it the sense of isolation. The exercise, intended to connect the sessions, ends up widening the distance between them.
Bringing the Struggle Back into the Room
One of the most useful things a client can do is bring the struggle back into the room, not as an apology but as a piece of honest reporting. This can sound simpler than it feels. A sentence such as “I have been avoiding the journal and I am not sure why” is not a confession. It is a contribution. So is “The breathing app seems to be making me more anxious” or “I did the worksheet once and then felt worse.” These statements give the therapist something real to work with.
A skilled counsellor will not respond with correction or disappointment. They will be curious. What was it like to open the notebook? What happened next? What did the exercise seem to promise, and what did it actually deliver? Together, client and therapist can decide whether to adapt the task, pause it, or set it aside entirely. The point is not to complete the exercise. The point is to understand the person attempting it.
It can also help to name the pattern directly. “I notice I am treating this like homework” is a useful observation. It opens a conversation about where that pressure comes from and whether it belongs in the counselling relationship at all. Often it does not. Often it belongs to an older story about achievement, approval or the need to be good.
Rethinking the Space Between Sessions
The space between sessions does not have to be filled with tasks in order to be valuable. Sometimes the most useful thing a person can do is notice what is already happening: the tension in the shoulders before a meeting, the dip in mood as the afternoon darkens, the small relief of a walk along the canal or through Corporation Park. These observations are not homework. They are simply attention.
For some people, a structured task is genuinely helpful. It offers focus and a sense of continuity. For others, it becomes another item on a list that is already too long. Neither response is wrong. The task should fit the person, not the other way around. A counsellor can offer options, explain their purpose, and make clear that declining is permitted. Consent matters in the small things as well as the large ones.
A Kinder Measure
Therapy is not a performance. It is a relationship in which someone can begin to understand themselves with more honesty and less judgement. If a between-session exercise starts to feel like a test, that is worth saying aloud. It is not a failure of the work. It is part of the work.
At KWC Counselling Blackburn, we understand that people often arrive with a long history of trying to get things right. The counselling room is not another place to be graded. It is a place where the struggle can be brought into the open, without apology, and met with curiosity rather than correction. If the task between sessions has begun to feel like an exam, that is not a reason to withdraw. It is a reason to talk.